The painter as a prophet turned towards the past
This article deals with the problem of recognition of the romantic model of memory in contemporary art and theory, which emerged after the so-called “narrative turn”. The ambiguous philosophical statement by Friedrich Schlegel is taken as a key-phrase for the analysis. It unlocks the character of the artist’s (painter’s) visions and ambitions settled at the beginning of the 19th century. A constitutive role of active memorization in the process of romantic creativity required commemoration to be the central aim of artistic expression. It is also a rudiment of popular contemporary artistic strategies. Imaginative narratives and subjective myths spread in numerous, inertial, visual metaphors. Are they overcoming the romantic intention or extending it? Following the insights of Andreas Huyssen, Franklin Rudolf Ankersmit and other researches, this analysis tries to touch upon a huge transformation in the understanding of memory and emphasises that there are important abandoned aspects close to the highly psychologized version of romantic memory, which lie in the philosophical-theological interpretations of romanticism. They do not allow us to reduce memory to a “theme” or an “object” of an artistic project. The author highlights the influence of the power of memory upon the creation of form and the inner anticipation of meanings. Without this positive and idealized understanding of memory (emphasized by romantic philosophies), pictorial expression would lose its uniqueness.
Béguin Albert (1991) L’Âme romantique et le Rêve, Paris: José Corti.
Britto Paulo Henriques (2000) Poetry and Memory, transl. P. H. Britto. http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/phbritto/Poetry_and_Memory.pdf
Ferguson Frances (1996) Romantic Memory, “Studies in Romanticism” Vol. 35, No. 4, Winter, pp. 509–533.
Huyssen Andreas (1995) Twilight Memories. Making Time in a Culture of Amnesia, London: Routledge.
Klein Kerwin Lee (2000) On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse, “Representations” (Special Issue: “Grounds for Remembering”) No. 69, Winter, pp. 127–150.
Langer Susanne Knauth (1953) Feeling and Form. A Theory of Art, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Lyotard Jean-François (1991) The Inhuman. Reflections on Time, transl. G. Bennington, R. Bow¬bly, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pfau Thomas (2010) Mourning Modernity: Classical Antiquity, Romantic Theory, and Elegiac Form, “The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy”, ed. K. Weisman, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 546–564.
Schlegel Friedrich (1971) Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments, transl. P. Firchow, Min¬neapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Trybuś Krzysztof (2007), Biografia romantyczna jako forma pamięci, “Biografie romantycznych poetów”, ed. Z. Trojanowiczowa, J. Borowczyk, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzy¬stwa Przyjaciół Nauk.
Copyright (c) Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.