The painter as a prophet turned towards the past

Keywords: romanticism, postromanticism, memory, representation, narrative, painting, historicity

Abstract

This article deals with the problem of recognition of the romantic model of memory in contemporary art and theory, which emerged after the so-called “narrative turn”. The ambi­guous philosophical statement by Friedrich Schlegel is taken as a key-phrase for the analysis. It unlocks the character of the artist’s (painter’s) visions and ambitions settled at the beginning of the 19th century. A constitutive role of active memorization in the process of romantic creativity required commemoration to be the central aim of artistic expression. It is also a rudiment of popular contemporary artistic strategies. Imaginative narratives and subjective myths spread in numerous, inertial, visual metaphors. Are they overcoming the romantic intention or extending it? Following the insights of Andreas Huyssen, Franklin Rudolf Ankersmit and other researches, this analysis tries to touch upon a huge transformation in the understanding of memory and em­phasises that there are important abandoned aspects close to the highly psychologized version of romantic memory, which lie in the philosophical-theological interpretations of romanticism. They do not allow us to reduce memory to a “theme” or an “object” of an artistic project. The author highlights the influence of the power of memory upon the creation of form and the inner anticipation of meanings. Without this positive and idealized understanding of memory (empha­sized by romantic philosophies), pictorial expression would lose its uniqueness.

Author Biography

Agnė Kulbytė, Vilnius Academy of Arts, Lithuania

PhD, lecturer at Vilnius Academy of Arts, Painting Department. She has an MA degree in Painting (2003) and a BA degree in Art (2007) from Vilnius Academy of Arts; between 2009 and 2013, she completed her doctoral studies in Phi­losophy at the Lithuanian Culture Research Institute in Vilnius (subject of the disser­tation: “Romanticism as the Source of Postmodern Aesthetic Representation“, 2014). Her field of research and publications are contemporary interpretations of romantic philosophy and aesthetics, modern and postmodern theories of art, abstract painting.

References

Ankersmit Franklin Rudolf (2001) Historical Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Béguin Albert (1991) L’Âme romantique et le Rêve, Paris: José Corti.

Britto Paulo Henriques (2000) Poetry and Memory, transl. P. H. Britto. http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/phbritto/Poetry_and_Memory.pdf

Ferguson Frances (1996) Romantic Memory, “Studies in Romanticism” Vol. 35, No. 4, Winter, pp. 509–533.

Huyssen Andreas (1995) Twilight Memories. Making Time in a Culture of Amnesia, London: Routledge.

Klein Kerwin Lee (2000) On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse, “Representations” (Special Issue: “Grounds for Remembering”) No. 69, Winter, pp. 127–150.

Langer Susanne Knauth (1953) Feeling and Form. A Theory of Art, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Lyotard Jean-François (1991) The Inhuman. Reflections on Time, transl. G. Bennington, R. Bow¬bly, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Pfau Thomas (2010) Mourning Modernity: Classical Antiquity, Romantic Theory, and Elegiac Form, “The Oxford Handbook of the Elegy”, ed. K. Weisman, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 546–564.

Schlegel Friedrich (1971) Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments, transl. P. Firchow, Min¬neapolis: Minnesota University Press.

Trybuś Krzysztof (2007), Biografia romantyczna jako forma pamięci, “Biografie romantycznych poetów”, ed. Z. Trojanowiczowa, J. Borowczyk, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzy¬stwa Przyjaciół Nauk.
Published
2020-12-25