A study on the ineffectiveness of Japan’s Stewardship Code (2014) confronted with Japan’s Fair Disclosure Rule (2018)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/SPE/2020/114/16Keywords:
Abenomics, conflicts of interests, corporate governanceAbstract
Background: Abenomics is a policy mix that was designed and introduced by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Japan. It aims to revive the Japanese economy and has been advocated by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his Cabinet since December 2012. Since 1989, Japan has experienced a severe financial crisis and almost 30 years of economic stagnation, known as the “Lost Decades”.
Research purpose: This study examines the ineffectiveness of one of Abenomics’ solutions, Japan’s Stewardship Code (2014), “the Code,” confronted with Japan’s Fair Disclosure Rule (2018). The Code aims to both enhance returns for financial investors and foster the corporate value and sustainable growth of investee companies. The purpose of this study is, first, to clarify the relationship between stock prices and earnings-to-price ratios in the Japanese stock market, reflecting the worst performance period of 1989–2018, when stock prices continuously declined. The second is to judge whether it is meaningful or meaningless to carry out the Code from a long-term investors’ perspective.
Methods: I used an approach by Brealey, Myers, and Allen (2008), where a discount dividend model and the net present value of future-growth opportunities are discussed.
Conclusions: I concluded that it would surely be ineffective to carry out the Code in Japan.
References
Brealey R., Myer S., Allen F. (BMA), Corporate Finance, Eighth Edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2006.
Cadbury Report, Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, The Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee Publishing Ltd., 1992, pp. 1–64.
Fama E., Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm in Journal of Political Economy 1980/1988 (2), The University of Chicago Press, pp. 288–307.
Fama, E., French K., The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns in The Journal of Finance 1992/47 (2), pp. 427–465.
Financial Reporting Council, UK, The UK Stewardship Code, Code: Corporate Governance, September 2012.
Financial Service Agency, Japan, Fair Disclosure Rule, Financial Instruments and Exchange Act Japan, Act No.25, Article 27: Sub-36, the Original Act enacted on April 13, 1948, amended on April 1, 2018.
Financial Service Agency, Japan, Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors Japan’s Stewardship Code) – To promote sustainable growth of companies through investment and dialogue, in The Council of Experts Concerning the Japanese version of Stewardship Code, 2014, p. 1.
Hampel Report, Committee of Corporate Governance: Final Report, The Committee of Corpo¬rate Governance, Gee Publishing Ltd., 1998, pp. 1–60.
Jensen M., Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers in American Economic Review 1986/76 (2), pp. 323–329.
Kay J., The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-term Decision Making Final Report in Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, House of Commons, 2012.
Modigliani F., Miller M., Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: a correction in Amer¬ican Economic Review 1963, 53 (3), pp. 433–443.
Modigliani F., Miller M., The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Invest¬ment in American Economic Review 1958/48 (3), pp. 261–297.
OECD, Options to improve the Governance and Investment of Japan’s Government Pension Fund in Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and private pensions, 2010.
Walker review, A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities, Final Recommendations, The Walker review secretariat, 2009.
