Geoheritage of protected areas, their protection and tourist promotion on the example of the Stołowe Mountains National Park – the document analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/AGL/2022/112/11

Keywords:

geotourism, Nature Protection Plan, geotourist resources, tourist product

Abstract

The article presents the main assumptions for the protection of objects and features of inanimate natural value in protected areas – attractions that may constitute the basis for developing geotourism in a region, on the example of the Stołowe Mountains National Park. Geo-touristic potential was presented based on the analysis of official legal documents devel-oped for the protection of the Park. These were: the draft plan for the protection of PNGS and the Park’s 2014–22 protection tasks de-signed to determine the threats related to tour-ism development, as well as the Park’s official website. Geotouristic resources were presented in documents, and their selection is a practical expression of the tourism development policy in the protected area. The method of presentation was also analysed. The Stołowe Mountains National Park is located in the Stołowe Mountains, which are part of the Central Sudetes. Its geotouristic at-tractiveness is determined by its unique relief, which reflects its geological structure. Most of the mountains, built of sedimentary rocks, are examples of structural relief. It is the only ex-ample of slab relief in Poland. The area is protected by the Nature Conservation Act of 16 April 2004. The Act requires that a nature conservation plan be developed according to which specific natural resources, including in-animate ones, should be protected.

If the plan has not yet been approved, temporary protection of resources is conducted based on protection tasks approved each time by the competent minister. The current set of tasks consists of several parts. These include: the identification and assessment of existing and potential internal and external threats; the indication of ways to eliminate or reduce these threats and their effects; the description of the methods of active protection of ecosystems, specifying their type, size and location; and the determination of places made available for scientific, educational, tourist purposes together with the maximum number of people that can stay in these places at any one time.

Apart from the above set of tasks, the need for protection is shown in the Park’s draft nature protection plan. Some of the protection objectives there mention preserving biological diversity and geological and geomorphological heritage, as well as shaping appropriate human attitudes towards nature through education, information and promotion in the field of nature protection.

Due to the richness of the geoheritage, the objectives of protecting inanimate nature were also indicated. The project contains a list of the most valuable geological and geomorphological objects found in the area of the Park – a total of 73 objects. The top ten, in the order of the list, were: Szczeliniec Wielki, Błędne Skały, Białe Skały, Rocks at Radkowskie Urwisko, rocks at Słoneczne Cliff, Skalne Grzyby, the rocks of Góra Zbój, the rocks of Góra Dzik, the rocks of Fort Karol and Samotnika, and Skałki Łężyckie. This list became the basis for the promotion of geotourism resources pre-sented at the Park’s official website. The places and manner of presentation were analysed.

The analysis of the documents that de-scribe the activities of the Stołowe Mountains National Park shows that they are well thought-out and fit into the nature protection policy in Poland and basically meet all the requirements related to inanimate nature. This applies to the implementation of the tasks set out in article 3 of the Act, which includes legal protection of resources, formations and components of nature, implementation of the programme for the protection of sustainable usage of biodiversity, along with the action planning and con-ducting of educational, information and promotional activities in the field of nature protection. The tasks of national parks are clarified in Article 8 of the Act: indicating how protective activities are conducted in the park's ecosystems, making the area of the national park available on the terms set out in the protection plan or protective tasks, and conducting activities related to environmental education (Journal of Laws of 004, No. 92, item 880).

All these elements are implemented by the Stołowe Mountains National Park, or at least the will to do so is expressed in the relevant documents specifying tasks that take into account the specificity of the area it protects. This specificity stems from the unique relief of the mountains, together with their inanimate nature resources.

As clearly seen from the analysed documents and source materials, the park also fulfils its statutory obligation to make available the in-animate nature attractions, for research, educational and tourist purposes alike. The particular points of the protection tasks or the draft protection plan indicate a sustainable approach to the use of attractions. The threats described in the documents are followed by ideas for reducing or eliminating them, so that the re-sources of inanimate nature can be made avail-able to visitors to the Park. The type of protective tasks and their size, which has a very practical and detailed dimension, are also defined.

The Park, in accordance with the obligations imposed on it, undertakes appropriate pro-motional activities. It prepares its resources for reception by visitors by distributing relevant in-formation and prepares tourist products on the basis of geotourism resources. Such products are themed trails – didactic trails. In this way, the Park performs the educational, investigative and ecological education functions – one of the main functions of tourism. Information about them has been posted on the official web-site and is the result of an earlier inventory of resources.

References

Babbie E. 2003. Badania społeczne w praktyce. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.

Baggio R.A. 2003. Websites Analysis of Euro-pean Tourism Organizations. Anatolia 14: 93-106.

Balmford A., Beresford J., Green J., Naidoo R., Walpole M., Manica A. 2009. A global perspective of trends in nature-based tourism. PLoS Biology 7: 1-6.

Bastida U., Huan T.C. 2014. Performance evaluation of tourism websites’ information quality of four global destination brands: Beijing, Hong Kong, Shanghai and Taipei. Journal of Business Research 67: 167-170.

Božić S., Tomić N. 2015. Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: comparative analysis from two different perspectives – general tourists’ and geotourists’. Open Geosciences 7(1): 531-546.

Buckley R. 2009. Ecotourism: Principles and Practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Wielka Brytania

Buhalis D. 2003. ETourism. Information Technology for Strategic Tourism Management. Financial Times Prentice Hall, New York, USA.

Buhalis D., Law R. 2008. Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet – The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management 29: 609-623.

Burek C.V., Prosser C.D. 2008. The history of geoconservation: an introduction. Geological Society (London), Special Publications 300(1): 1-5.

Bushell R., Staiff R., Eagles P.F.J. 2007. Tourism and protected areas: Benefits beyond boundaries. W: R. Bushell, P.J.F. Eagles (red.) Tourism and protected area: Benefits beyond boundaries, CAB International, Wallingford.

Cano V., Prentice R. 1998. Opportunities for endearment to place through electronic ‘visiting’: WWW homepages and the tourism promotion of Scotland. Tourism Management 19(1): 67-73.

Ceballos-Lascurain H. 1996. Tourism Ecotourism and Protected Areas: the state of Nature-based Tourism Around the World and Guidelines for its Development. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, Anglia.

Del Vasto-Terrientes L., Fernández-Cavia J., Huertas A., Moreno A., Valls A. 2015. Official tourist destination websites: Hierarchical analysis and assessment with ELEC-TRE-III-H. Tourism Management Perspectives 15: 16-28.

Dowling R.K., Newsome D. 2006. Geotourism: sustainability, impacts and management. Elsevier, Oxford.

Duszyński F., Migoń P., Kasprzak M. 2018. Góry Stołowe – kraina zrodzona z morza, PNGS, Kudowa Zdrój.

Eagles P.F.J. 2014. Research priorities in park tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 22: 528-549.

Fassoulas C., Mouriki D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis P., Iliopoulos G. 2012. Quantitative Assessment of Geotopes as an Effective Tool for Geoheritage Management. Geoheritage 4: 177-193.

Garavaglia V., Diolaiuti G., Smiraglia C., Pasquale V., Pelfini M. 2012. Evaluating Tourist Perception of Environmental Changes as a Contribution to Managing Natural Resources in Glacierized Areas: A Case Study of the Forni Glacier (Stelvio National Park, Italian Alps), Environmental Management 50: 1125-1138.

Gray M. 2004. Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, Wielka Brytania.

Gray M. 2005. Geodiversity and geoconservation: what, why, and how? W: V.L. Santucci (red.) Papers Presented at the George Wright Forum: 4-12.

Gray M. 2011. Other nature: Geodiversity and geosystem services. Environmental Conservation 38(3): 271-27.

Gretzel U., Yuan Y.L., Fesenmaier D.R. 2000. Preparing for the New Economy: Advertising Strategies and Change in Destination Marketing Organizations. Journal of Travel Research 39: 146-156.

GUS. 2022. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Online: https://stat.gov.pl (data ostatniego dostępu: 15.12.2022).

Guyer C., Pollard J. 1997. Cruise visitor impressions of the environment of the Shannon-Erne waterways system. Journal of Environmental Management 51: 199-215.

Henriques M. H., Pena dos Reis R., Brilha J., Mota T. 2011. Geoconservation as an Emerging Geoscience, Geoheritage 3: 117-128.

Honey M. 2008. Ecotourism and sustainable development: who own paradise? Island Press, Washington.

Hose T.A. 1994. Telling the story of stone – assessing the client base. Geological and Landscape Conservation, Londyn.

Hose T.A. 1995. Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environmental Interpretation 10: 16-17.

Hose T.A. 1997. Geotourism – selling the Earth to Europe. Engineering Geology and the Environment, Rotterdam

Hose T.A. 2000. European Geotourism – Geological Interpretation and Geoconservation Promotion for Tourists. Geological Heritage: Its Conservation and Management, Madrid.

Hose T.A. 2008. Towards a history of geotourism: definitions, antecedents and the future, Geological Society, Londyn.

Hose T.A. 2011. The English Origins of Geotourism (as a Vehicle for Geoconservation) and their relevance to current studies. Acta Geographica Slovenica 5: 1-2.

Hose T.A. Vasiljević D.A. 2012. Defining the Nature and Purpose of Modern Geotourism with Particular Reference to the United Kingdom and South-East Europe. Geoheritage 4(1–2): 25-43.

Hvass K.A., Munar A.M. 2012. The takeoff of social media in tourism. Journal of Vacation Marketing 18: 93-103.

Hyun M.Y., O’Keefe R.M. 2012. Virtual destination image: Testing a telepresence model. Journal of Business Research, 65: 29-35.

Kaiser A., Purcelewska I. 2016. Turystyka jako sposób na obniżenie poziomu stresu w opinii osób aktywnych zawodowo. Studia Periegetica 16(2): 143-156.

Korybo J. 2018. Historia ochrony przyrody w Górach Stołowych. W: C. Kabała (red.) Góry Stołowe – przyroda i ludzie, PNGS, Kudowa Zdrój: 391-403.

Kowalczyk A. 2001. Geografia turyzmu. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.

Kruczek Z. 2002. Atrakcje turystyczne. Metody oceny ich odbioru – interpretacja. Folia Turistica 13: 37-61.

Kuenzi C., McNeely J. 2008. Nature-based tourism. W: O. Renn, K.D. Walker (red.) Global Risk Governance IUCN Publishing, Gland, Szwajcaria: 155-178.

Kurek W. (red.). 2007. Turystyka. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.

Lee W., Gretzel U. 2012. Designing persuasive destination websites: A mental imagery processing perspective. Tourism Manage-ment 33: 1270-1280.

Lehto X.Y., Kim D.Y., Morrison A.M. 2006. The effect of prior destination experience on online information search behaviour. Tourism and Hospitality Research 6: 160--178.

Lijewski T., Mikułowski B., Wyrzykowski J. 2002. Geografia turystyki Polski. PWE, Warszawa.

Lima F., Brilha J., Salamun E. 2010. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage 2: 91-99.

McCool S.F. 2009. Constructing partnerships for protected area tourism planning in an era of change and messiness, Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17(2): 133-148.

McIntosh R.W., Goeldner C.R., Ritchie J.R.B. 1995. Tourism: Principles, Practices, Philosophies. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Nowy Jork–Chichester–Brisbane–Toronto–Singapur.

Newsome D., Dowling R.K. 2010. Geotourism: the tourism of geology and landscape. Goodfellow, Oxford.

Newsome D., Moore S.A., Dowling R.K. 2013. Natural Area Tourism: Ecology, Impacts and Management 2nd Edition, Channel View Publications, Bristol, Wielka Brytania.

Noti E. 2013. The websites of National Tourism Organisations: A challenge of E-marketing. Anglisticum Journal 2: 241-249.

Nowakowska A. 2002. Produkt turystyczny. W: G. Gołembski (red.) Kompendium wiedzy o turystyce. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa–Poznań.

Plan Ochrony Parku Narodowego Gór Stołowych. 2013. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska w sprawie ustanowienia planu ochrony dla Parku Narodowego Gór Stołowych z uwzględnieniem zakresu planu ochrony dla obszarów Natura 2000 PLH020004 i PLB020006 Góry Stołowe, PROJEKT, Warszawa.

PNGS. 2022. Park Narodowy Gór Stołowych. Online: https://www.pngs.com.pl (data ostatniego dostępu: 15.12.2022).

Rogalewski O. 1979. Zagospodarowanie turystyczne, WSiP, Warszawa.

Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 12 maja 2005 r. w sprawie sporządzania projektu planu ochrony dla parku narodowego, rezerwatu przyrody i parku krajobrazowego, dokonywania zmian w tym planie oraz ochrony zasobów, tworów i składników przyrody, Dz.U. 2005 nr 94 poz. 794.

Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 16 września 1993 r. w sprawie utworzenia Parku Narodowego Gór Stołowych, Dz.U. 1993 nr 88 poz. 407.

Santangelo N., Romano P., Santo A. 2015. Geoitineraries in the Cilento Vallo di Diano Geopark: A Tool for Tourism Development in Southern Italy. Geoheritage 7: 319-335.

Serrano E., González-Trueba J.J. 2005. Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie. Formes, processus, environnement 3: 197-208.

Słomka T., Kicińska-Świderska A. 2004. Geoturystyka – podstawowe pojęcia. Geoturystyka 1: 5-7.

Śniadek J., Zajadacz A. 2014. Turystyka i rekreacja a jakość życia mieszkańców Leszna. Ekonomiczne Problemy Turystyki 1(25): 341-367.

Tan L., Jang S. 2012. Investigating the Routes of Communication on Destination Websites. Journal of Travel Research 51: 94- -108.

Tonge J., Moore S. 2007. Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study. Tourism Management 28: 768-776.

Ustawa z dnia 16 kwietnia 2004 r. o ochronie przyrody, Dz. U. 2004 nr 92 poz. 880.

Ustawa z dnia 27 sierpnia 2009 r. o finansach publicznych, Dz. U. Nr 157, poz. 1240.

Vyas C. 2019. Evaluating state tourism websites using Search Engine Optimization tools. Tourism Management 73: 64-70.

Warszyńska J., Jackowski A. 1978. Podstawy geografii turyzmu. Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.

William J. Hunt Jr. 2010. A Model of Tourism as Context for Historical Sites: An Example of Historical Archeology at Yellowstone National Park, W: A. Corbin, M.A. Russell (red.) Historical Archeology of Tourism in Yellowstone National Park, Nowy Jork, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, Londyn, Springer: 1-74.

Xiang Z., Gretzel U. 2010. Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management 31:179-188.

Zarządzenie Ministra Klimatu z dnia 13 stycznia 2020 r. w sprawie zadań ochronnych dla Parku Narodowego Gór Stołowych na lata 2020–2022, Dziennik Urzędowy Ministra Klimatu, Warszawa, dnia 14 stycznia 2020 r., Poz. 8.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20

How to Cite

Widawski, K. (2022). Geoheritage of protected areas, their protection and tourist promotion on the example of the Stołowe Mountains National Park – the document analysis. Acta Geographica Lodziensia, 112, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.26485/AGL/2022/112/11

Issue

Section

Articles