Subsidiarity, fiscal decentralisation and financial autonomy of local and regional governments in Poland – the past and the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/SPE/2020/117/18Keywords:
sub-national government, revenue autonomy, expenditure autonomyAbstract
Background: Past changes in Polish local and regional governments’ financial autonomy give rise to the question whether local and regional governments in Poland still have sufficient financial autonomy to perform in line with the requirements of the principle of subsidiarity. Dimensions of special concern are revenue as well as selected recent legislation changes’ potential future impact on Polish local and regional governments’ financial autonomy in terms of both revenue and expenditure.
Research purpose: The main objective of the article is to reflect upon the notion of local and regional self-governance, and to critically assess the current degree of financial autonomy of local and regional governments in Poland.
Methods: The article starts with a review of literature covering key concepts – subsidiarity, fiscal decentralisation, and local governments’ financial autonomy. Some of the approaches used to operationalise and measure financial autonomy are also highlighted and later used in the analysis and discussion.
Conclusions: The article ends with a call for general debate on the future of local and regional governments in Poland as the past trends and expected future developments – in light of discussed legislation changes as well as the potential impacts of the covid-19 pandemic – demonstrate the gradual erosion of the local governance model, which was founded three decades ago on a premise of strong financial autonomy.
Downloads
References
Akai N., Nishimura Y., Sakata M., Complementarity, fiscal decentralization and economic growth, Economics of Governance 2007/8, pp. 339–362.
Bahl R., Linn J.F., Urban public finance in developing countries, World Bank 1992.
Bailey S.J., Local government economics: principles and practice, Macmillan, London 1999.
Baldwin R.E., Krugman P., Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 2002/9290, Cambridge, MA.
Besley T., Case A.C., Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition, American Economic Review 1995/85, pp. 25–45.
Besley T., Coate S., Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy analysis, Journal of Public Economics 2003/87, pp. 2611–2637.
Blöchliger H., Akgun O., Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth, in: J. Kim, S. Dough¬erty (eds.), Fiscal Decentralisation and Inclusive Growth, OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies 2018, pp. 21–44.
Dziemianowicz R., Dysfunkcje udziałów w podatkach państwowych w aspekcie zmniejszającej się samodzielności dochodowej samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce [Dysfunctions of shares in state income taxes in the aspect of decreasing the revenue autonomy of the local govern¬ment in Poland], Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 2017/485, pp. 90–107.
Ebel R., Yilmaz S., On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 2002/2809, Washington, DC.
Forbes, Samorządy boją się, że zapłacą za niższe podatki. Warszawa może stracić 1,3 mld zł, Forbes.pl, date of publication: 15.07.2019; accessed 18.06.2020.
Føllesdal A., Competing conceptions of subsidiarity, in: J.E. Fleming, J.T. Levy, Federalism and Subsidiarity, NOMOS LV, Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philo-sophy, New Your University Press, New York and London 2014, pp. 214–230.
Hansen T., Klausen J.E., Between the welfare state and local government autonomy, Local Gov¬ernment Studies 2010/28 (4), pp. 47–66.
Horga I., Florian G.L., Multilevel Governance (MLG) and Subsidiary Principle in White Paper of MLG of the Committee of the Regions (COR), MPRA Paper 2011/44854, University of Munich.
Huther J., Shah A., Applying a simple measure of good governance in the debate on fiscal decen¬tralization, World Bank 1999, doi: 10.1596/1813–9450–1894.
Jordan A., Jeppesen T., EU environmental policy: adapting to the principle of subsidiarity?, European Environment 2000/10, pp. 64–74.
Kalisiak-Mędelska M., Some aspects of public administration reforms in Poland after 1989 – the revenue autonomy of local governments, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 2013/324, pp. 70–81.
Kamiński R., Samorząd terytorialny w świetle zasady subsydiarności, Civitas Homnibus: rocz¬nik filozoficzno-społeczny 2013/8, pp. 43–54.
Letelier L., Explaining fiscal decentralization, Public Finance Review 2005/33/2, pp. 155–183.
de Lourdes Melo Zurita M., Cook B., Harms L., March A., Towards new disaster governance: subsidiarity as a critical tool, Environmental Policy and Governance 2015/25, pp. 386–398.
Martinez-Vazquez J., Lago-Penas S., Sacchi A., The impact of fiscal decentralization: a survey, Journal of Economic Surveys 2017/31/4, pp. 1095–1129.
Martini A., Spataro L., The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Ethical Factor in Giuseppe Tonio¬lo’s Thought, Journal of Business Ethics 2018/153, pp. 105–119.
de Mello L.R., Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: a cross-country analysis, World Development 2000/28/2, pp. 365–380.
Meloche J.-P., Vaillancourt F., Yilmaz S., Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? Effects on growth and public sector size in European transition countries, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 2004/3254, Washington, DC.
Oates W.E., Fiscal decentralization and economic development, National Tax Journal 1993/46/2, pp. 237–243.
Oulasvirta L., Turała M., Financial autonomy and consistency of central government policy towards local governments, International Review of Administrative Sciences 2009/75 (2), pp. 311–332.
Poniatowicz M., Determinanty autonomii dochodowej samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce [De¬terminants of the revenue autonomy of the local government in Poland], Nauki o Finansach 2015/1 (22), pp. 11–30.
Schütze R., Subsidiarity after Lisbon: reinforcing the safeguards of federalism?, Cambridge Law Journal 2009/68 (3), pp. 525–536.
Spolaore E., The political economy of European integration, National Bureau of Economic Re¬search, Working Paper 2015/21250, Cambridge, MA.
Stegarescu D., Public sector decentralisation: measurement concepts and recent international trends, Fiscal Studies 2005/26 (3), pp. 301–333.
Surówka K., Adekwatność dochodów jst do zakresu realizowanych zadań a problem ich samo¬dzielności finansowej na przykładzie gmin oraz miast na prawach powiatu [The adequacy of local government’ revenue on realized tasks and the problem of their financial autonomy on the example of municipalities and cities with the rights of district], Prace Naukowe Uni¬wersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 2017/485, pp. 430–439.
Teasdale A.L., Subsidiarity in post-Maastricht Europe, The Political Quarterly 1993/64/2, pp. 187–197.
Tiebout C., A pure theory of local expenditures, Journal of Political Economy 1956/64, pp. 416–424.
Weingast B.R., The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1995/11/1, pp. 1–31.
Wildasin D.E., Interjurisdictional capital mobility: fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy, Journal of Urban Economics 1989/25, pp. 193–212.
van Zeben J., Subsidiarity in European environmental law: a competence allocation approach, Harvard Environmental Law Review 2014/38, pp. 415–464.
