How designers think. Conceptual blending in design

Authors

  • Hanna Bytniewska Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Lublin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26485/AI/2023/25/8

Keywords:

design, conceptual blending, metaphor, visual thinking

Abstract

The article aims at pointing out those areas of design in which a structure of metaphor1 can be useful and testing out its sufficiency. The basis for reflection are examples of existing design solutions. Decisions made by designers on the future shape, functionality and appearance of an object are rooted in their knowledge about the material world and human needs, but also transfer their ideas regarding the role and purpose of design itself in social life. The presented examples relate to a specific way of thinking common for designers working on a project. The article argues that a designer's way of thinking can be broadly described using a conceptual blen­ding model rather than a metaphor structure which does not always apply. In Polish literature, conceptual blending, translated as amalgamaty pojęciowe, refers to linguistics and is mostly used in linguistic research. The article proposes a different translation, amalgamaty koncepcyjne, as a broader term which can also be used in visual thinking research, as well as design.

Author Biography

Hanna Bytniewska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Lublin

Hanna Bytniewska – photographer, graphic designer, illustrator, mindful observer of social life. A graduate of the Institute of Fine Arts at Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (2008) and postgraduate studies in Design Management at the Warsaw School of Economics and the Institute of Industrial Design (2015). From 2018, a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. Her art work shave been exhibited in Poland, Finland and the UK.

References

Black Max (1971) Metafora, [in:] „Pamiętnik Literacki LXII”, vol. 3, pp. 217-234.

FauconnierGilles, Turner Mark (2002) The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities, New York: Basic Books.

Fauconnier Gilles, Turner Mark (2019) Jak myślimy. Mieszaniny pojęciowe i ukryta złożoność umysłu, transl. I. Michalska. Warszawa: Fundacja Augusta Hr. Cieszkowskieg, Biblioteka Kwartalnika Kronos.

FultonSuriJane (2018). Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See, [in:] Clarke Alison J. (ed.) Design Anthropology: Object Culture in the 21st Century, London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 69-85.

Gemel Aleksander (2017) Codzienność metafory w perspektywie kognitywistycznej. Próba krytycznej analizy, [in:] „NAUKI O WYCHOWANIU. STUDIA INTERDYSCYPLINARNE” NUMER 2016/1(2), (pp. 172-186).

Giddens Anthony (2010). Nowoczesność i tożsamość, transl. A. Szulżycka. Warszawa: PWN.

Lakoff George, Johnson Mark (2010) Metafory w naszym życiu, transl. T. P. Krzeszowski, Warszawa, Aletheia.

Libura Agnieszka (2007) Amalgamaty kognitywne w sztuce, Kraków: Universitas.

Papanek Victor (1973). Design for the real World, Toront/ New York/ London: Bantam Books.

Papanek Victor ( 2012). Design dlarealnegoświata, Łódź: Recto Verso.

Simonsen Jesper, Robertson Toni (2012) Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, London: Routledge.

Starakiewicz Maja (2019) Model i metafora. Komunikacja wizualna w humanistyce, Kraków: Korporacja Ha!art.

SudjicDeyan (2013) Język rzeczy. Dizajn i luksus, moda i sztuka. W jaki sposób przedmioty nas uwodzą?, Kraków: Karakter.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-13