Warm solidarity in the Belgian homelessness policy assemblage during the coronavirus pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26485/PS/2023/72.1/5Keywords:
homelessness, policy assemblage, coronavirus pandemic, new charity, warm solidarity, BelgiumAbstract
In 2020 in Belgium the coronavirus crisis generated a widespread solidarity between the housed and the homeless. This paper adopts a policy assemblage approach to investigate policy responses to the pandemic with regards to actions, discourses and spatial materialities around homelessness. Three areas of contingent reassembling emerged from the analysis: spaces of cooperation, domestic space and public space. All three were permeated with new charity power relations and warm solidarity rhetoric. Firstly, emergency responses involved a high level of cooperation between different actors. Secondly, domestic space became a space for participation for helpers, while recipients – temporarily and as an exceptional measure – were granted access to it. Thirdly, daily practices in public space revealed and exacerbated power imbalances. Additionally, homelessness was portrayed in the media as caused by these exceptional circumstances rather than a problem of structural inequalities and insufficient policies. In this rhetoric, increased civic solidarity was the answer to the extraordinary situation. Despite all their drawbacks, in the context of the multilevel Belgian administrative structure, however, these contingent initiatives are potentially also a tool of critique and policy change
References
Bishop Matthew. 2013. “Philanthrocapitalism: Solving public problems through private means”. Social Research 80(2): 473–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sor.2013.0012.
Bogaerts Nico. 2019. Zelforganisatie is geen excuus voor terugtrekkende overheid. https://sociaal.net/achtergrond/zelforganisatie-geen-excuus-terugtrekkende-overheid/ [access: 21.12.2022].
Briassoulis Helen. 2019. “Governance as multiplicity: The assemblage thinking perspective”. Policy Sciences 52: 419–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-09345-9.
Bruss Help. 2020. Dak- en thuislozentelling in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. Brussels: Bruss Help.
Bueger Christian. 2018. “Territory, authority, expertise: Global governance and the counter- piracy assemblage”. European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 614–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066117725155.
Cantillon Bea. 2020. Het verschijnsel ‘voedselbanken’, een wapen in handen van de voorvechters van sociale grondrechten. In: Noodhulp onder protest. Voedselbanken als wapen voor sociale grondrechten. B. Segaert, N. van Uffelen, C. Van Wonterghem (eds.), 11–24. Antwerpen: Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius.
Clarke Andrew, Cameron Parsell. 2020. “The ambiguities of homelessness governance: Disentangling care and revanchism in the neoliberalising city”. Antipode 52(6): 1624–1646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anti.12671.
Cloke Paul, Sarah Johnsen, Jon May. 2012. Ethical citizenship? Faith-based volunteers and the ethics of providing services for homeless people. In: Faith-based organizations and exclusion in European cities. J. Beaumont, P. Cloke (eds.), 127–154. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Cloke Paul, Jon May, Sarah Johnsen. 2006. “Exploring ethos? Discourses of «charity» in the provision of emergency services for homeless people”. Environment and Planning A 37: 385–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a36189.
Davelaar Maarten, Wendy Kerstens. 2012. A shelter from the storm: Faith-based organisations and providing relief for the homeless. In: Faith-based organizations and exclusion in European cities. J. Beaumont, P. Cloke (eds.), 199–218. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
de Beer Paul, Ferry Koster. 2009. Sticking together or falling apart? Solidarity in an era of individualization and globalization. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789089641281.
Debruyne Pascal, Harm Deleu, Mieke Schrooten. 2020. Corona maakt het onzichtbare zichtbaar: Migratie verandert dak- en thuisloosheid. https://sociaal.net/achtergrond/migratie-verandert-dak-en-thuisloosheid/ [access: 21.12.2022].
Deleu Harm, Rebecca Thys, Mieke Schrooten. 2022. “The role of non-profit organisations in the support of people experiencing homelessness in Brussels”. European Journal of Homelessness 16(1): 101–126.
Demaerschalk Evelien, Koen Hermans. 2020. Dak- en thuislozentelling Leuven. Leuven: LUCAS, KU Leuven.
Elander Ingemar, Maarten Davelaar, Andrés Walliser. 2012. Faith-based organisations, urban governance and welfare state retrenchment. In: Faith-based organizations and exclusion in European cities. J. Beaumont, P. Cloke (eds.), 81–104. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Fitzpatrick Suzanne, Beth Watts, Rhiannon Sims. 2020. Homelessness monitor England 2020: COVID-19 crisis response briefing. London: Crisis.
Herman Aghata, Justin Beaumont, Paul Cloke, Andrés Walliser. 2012. Spaces of postsecular engagement in cities. In: Faith-based organization and exclusion in European cities. J. Beaumont, P. Cloke (eds.), 59–80. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Hermans Koen, Evelyn Dyb, Marcus Knutagård, Sonja Novak-Zezula, Ursula Trummer. 2020. Migration and homelessness: Measuring the intersections. European Journal of Homelessness 14(3): 13–34.
Kessl Fabian, Melanie Oechler, Tina Schröder. 2020. Charity economy and social work. In: European social work – a compendium. F. Kessl, W. Lorenz, O. Hans-Uwe, S. White (eds.), 365–381. Leverkusen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvscxsrf.22.
Koster Martijn. 2015. “Citizenship agendas, urban governance and social housing in the Netherlands: An assemblage approach”. Citizenship Studies 19(2): 214–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1005951.
Lancione Michele. 2014. “Assemblages of care and the analysis of public policies on homelessness in Turin, Italy”. City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action 18(1): 25–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.868163.
McCann Eugene. 2011. “Veritable inventions: Cities, policies and assemblage”. Area 43(2): 143–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01011.x.
Meys Evy, Koen Hermans. 2014. Nulmeting dak- en thuisloosheid. Leuven: Steunpunt Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin.
Midgley Jane. 2016. “Perspectives on responsibility in practice as revealed through food provisioning offers for rough sleepers”. Critical Social Policy 36(4): 610–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018316640242.
Mormont Marinette, Manon Legrand. 2020. Sans-abrisme, l’autre pandémie. https://www.alterechos.be/sans-abrisme-lautre-pandemie/ [access: 21.12.2022].
Oosterlynck Stijn. 2020. Over sociale noden en sociale rechten: Lokale sociale innovatie en de welvaartsstaat. In: Noodhulp onder protest. Voedselbanken als wapen voor sociale grondrechten. B. Segaert, N. van Uffelen, C. Van Wonterghem (eds.), 31–40. Antwerpen: Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignasius.
Parsell Cameron, Andrew Clarke. 2022. “Charity and shame: Towards reciprocity”. Social Problems 69(2): 436–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaa057.
Parsell Cameron, Beth Watts. 2017. “Charity and justice: A reflection on new forms of homelessness provision in Australia”. European Journal of Homelessness 11(2): 65–76.
Parsell Cameron, Andrew Clarke, Ella Kuskoff. 2023. “Understanding responses to homelessness during COVID-19: An examination of Australia”. Housing Studies 138(1): 8–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1829564.
Parsell Cameron, Andrew Clarke, Francisco Perales. 2021. Poverty by design: The role of charity and the cultivated ethical citizen. Social Policy and Society 21(4): 525–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000312.
Plovie Elke. 2019. Burgers in beweging. In: Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap. M. Schrooten, R. Thys, P. Debruyne (eds.), 31–44. Brussel: Politeia.
Savage Glenn C. 2020. “What is policy assemblage?”. Territory, Politics, Governance 8(3): 319–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760.
Schuermans Nick, Mieke Schrooten, Mattias De Backer. 2019. Informele en formele sociaalwerkpraktijken als aankomstinfrastructurenvoor nieuwkomers. In: Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap. M. Schrooten, R. Thys, P. Debruyne (eds.), 147–158. Brussel: Politeia.
Spade Dean. 2020. “Solidarity not charity. Mutual aid for mobilization and survival”. Social Text 38(1): 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7971139.
Swyngedauw Karen. 2019. Informele netwerken als welzijnsactoren rond verborgenthuisloosheid in het Brussels gewest. In: Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap. M. Schrooten, R. Thys, P. Debruyne (eds.), 195–202. Brussel: Politeia.
Telling dak- en thuisloosheid. 2022. Departament Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin. https://armoede.vlaanderen.be/telling-dak-en-thuisloosheid [access: 04.03.2023].
Villadsen Kaspar. 2007. “The emergence of Neo-Philanthropy. A new discursive space in welfare policy?”. Acta Sociologica 50(3): 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993070809.